Regional Programs: Training
Child Rights .
Public Health (in particular HIV/AIDS) . Environment
. Gender and Social Justice . Archive
Regional Training Courses
4. Jamaica, July 1990 (NGO course)
Marine environment.
Media access by scientists.
Length 1 week.
Target Group
Environmental experts (researchers and policy makers). A region-wide
group was intended but owing to financial constraints, participation
was limited to Jamaica.
Objectives
To teach environmental experts on approaching the media and writing
skills for public audiences.
To define criteria for producing journalistic material in each
of the different media.
Context
This workshop took also place within the CARIMAC project "Environmental
issues and responsible reporting", initiated in early 1989.
Participants
8 environmentalists from Jamaica. Female/ Male Ratio: 7/1
Working Methodology and Activities
Teaching workshops in the morning and joint activities with the
media practitioners in the afternoon. Goal was to write print and
radio press releases; summaries; and feature stories on research.
Activities: Discussions, written exercises, exchange of ideas and
evaluation; approaching Caribbean media; composition of a press
release; popularization of environmental issues for wide audiences.
Documentation Used
List of environmental organizations and individuals was compiled
by CCA, to identify sources for stories, experts for interviews,
etc.
Wide variety of articles, reports, etc.
Results
List of media personnel in Jamaica, facilitating access to the media.
This list is being extended for the Caribbean.
Press releases and summaries of current scientific research in
accessible format and language.
These outputs were shared with participating journalists for dissemination
in their various countries.
Evaluation by Participants
Environmentalists wanted to be involved in radio production. They
liked doing press releases and found their reviews useful. Course
was found too short. Also, participants would have liked a clearer
schedule beforehand. In general, participants found the programme
very useful: "Someone should have done this kind of a course
a long time ago".
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Course should be approximately 10 days, and should include NGOs
(in addition to scientists), with a programme on target audiences/behavior,
media philosophy and techniques, interviewing techniques. A mixed
event of NGOs/scientists with media practitioners is also recommended.
Participants need to be selected better (there was a lack of attendance
during some sessions).
An alternative approach might be a series of seminars for scientists
conducted in the various island nations that would be specific to
local issues.
4. Kingston, Jamaica, 9-14 July 1990. CARIMAC/Panos
Course for NGOs "How to Approach the Media".
These production workshops were organized in follow-up
to the CCA/CARIMAC/Panos seminar in January 1990, which
focused on media managers. The summer school brought
together experienced journalists from print, radio and
TV from around the Caribbean. They were exposed to a
series of marine environment and development issues,
in order to produce printable and broadcastable outputs.
The summer school was conducted in Discovery Bay and
Montego Bay (first week) and the Mona campus (second
week).
During the summer school, introduction to marine environmental
issues was done through field trips and lectures by
experts. After an initial theoretical orientation in
Kingston, the entire group moved for six days to the
Discovery Bay Marine Lab. This Lab served as a home
base for various field trips and investigative work.
Participants were able to talk with fishermen, watersport
users, marine park personnel, researchers, hoteliers,
etc. Many potential sources had been contacted before,
but no specific appointments had been set up in advance.
Production meetings were held daily.
During the second week all tasks were implemented related
to the putting the final products together. There were
a number of resource persons from CARIMAC and Panos
as well as from CCA. Additionally, several personnel
of the University of the West Indies, two experienced
Jamaican journalists and media experts, and a science
teacher were made available.
A concurrent course specifically for environmental
scientists was held during this week, with as main goal
to train them on "how to make their own news".
After an overview of Caribbean media and meeting the
journalist-participants, the scientists were introduced
to news writing: how to compose a press release. The
second day, original research that the scientists brought
in was popularized for a wider audience. Subsequently,
exercises were conducted, such as being interviewed
by the media as sources of information.
During the final three days, the two groups were brought
together for review, discussion and evaluation. During
these sessions, the feature articles by the environmentalists
were critiqued, along with all the media outputs. Along
with many production-oriented questions, a number of
other issues emerged:
- The environmentalists appeared to write better articles
than the experienced journalists. This may be attributed
to their generally higher level of education, plus
the intense previous three days of learning how to
write a lengthy feature properly. Most journalists
do not often write such long features and may simply
have been "out of practice".
- Most of the participants had little or no previous
knowledge of marine ecosystems, their functions or
economic value. Many had never seen a coral reef before
or been in a mangrove swamp. After the courses, virtually
all of them confessed to being "converted"
to the environmental cause because they were now "informed"
about the issues.
- All participants intended to continue writing and
producing programmes on marine issues. Various elements
related to "commitment" were raised, as
well as the role of the journalist in informing the
public. Is it the journalist's role to inform the
public in such a way as to elicit action? How crucial
are media in creating a dynamic culture that includes
environmental concerns? Should the journalist promote
behaviour change?
|
|
|